The Chicago-based building construction and O&M company, The Hill Group uses BIM to simplify the design-to-fabrication process by using single platform for the processes.

Here are some that make it the preferred choice: The benefits of Revit MEP far outweigh the ease of use of AutoCAD MEP. Limited multi-disciplinary coordination and collaboration also delays the fabrication process. Two dimensional drawings makes it hard to visualize complex ductwork networks with multiple elevations. It cannot produce building information models. Standardized diagrams of MEP symbols created in AutoCAD MEP further ease production of 2D mechanical drawings.īut AutoCAD MEP has its own constraints. Often favoured by MEP technicians for fabrication and ductwork, AutoCAD MEP, a 2D software, has relatively easy to operate tools. The argument for and against AutoCAD MEP and Autodesk Revit These fabrication tools further enhance accuracy and improve collaboration between multiple MEP stakeholders including designers, engineers, manufacturers, contractors and installers. Detailed and design intended Revit MEP models ease the generation of shop drawings to facilitate smooth installation of complex ductwork.

Revit MEP supported fabrication tools serve as the perfect platform for stakeholders across disciplines to design, estimate and manufacture ductwork in a seamless and cost effective manner. Poorly communicated, incomplete or non-self-explanatory ductwork design and fabrication details can potentially cause delays in on-site and off-site fabrication processes. These arise largely because of the inability to visualise the entire duct network. MEP engineers working on complex ductwork networks are many a time confronted with design coordination challenges and resultant inaccuracies. Revit overcomes complex ductwork design and fabrication process challenges to ensure seamless operations by easy design intent communication and early clash detection.

Autodesk revit mep